Donate   Blog               Posts Comments

Bill introduced to prioritize early learning

Lawmakers are considering a bill that would establish universal voluntary early learning for 3- and 4- year olds in Washington. HB 2448 would also focus on birth to three programs.

Despite the state’s tough economic situation, there have been highlights in early learning. Many people now recognize that investment in high-quality early learning pays great dividends. Studies show that for every $1 spent, there is anywhere from $7-16 in savings. Last year, the state Legislature passed WaKIDS, a kindergarten transition process that brings kindergarten teachers together with parents and early learning providers to get kids started out on the right foot. Then in December, we found out that Washington was a winner in the federal Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge.

And now early learning advocates are looking to enhance our state’s offerings once again, this time with HB 2448.

Some highlights:

  • Tiered services – education and screening elements for all children with comprehensive services according to need
  • Funding based on student population
  • Mixed delivery system including  for/nonprofit child care,  tribal governments, and schools
  • Parent cost-sharing kick in above 250% of federal poverty level (about $56,000 for a family of four)
  • Professional development for provider/teachers
  • Evaluation and accountability measures

From birth to age 5, children go through growth that profoundly influences the course of their lives. Long before they reach kindergarten, they build the fundamental brain architecture that will help them get along in the world.

Rigorous research finds that high-quality early education can equip young children with life skills everyone: the ability to pay attention, respond responsibly to stress, and interact successfully with others. It can also boost school achievement, lower enrollment in special education, increase college attendance rates, and build a more just and prosperous state.

We count on kids to grow into healthy, hardworking adults who can maintain Washington’s competitive edge in the global economy. Yet more than half of children entering kindergarten classrooms across our state aren’t getting all they can from their first year of K-12.

If we invest in their first years, we can do far more to prepare our young to be the solid citizens and skilled workers of tomorrow.

Tight budget times demand that we maximize our investments. Short term costs for early education are more than offset by immediate and long-term benefits. If high-quality early learning programs for the most at-risk children were implemented, budget gains in Washington would surpass costs in 10 years or less. (Special thanks to the Early Learning Action Alliance for the summary.)

For those of you who love all all of the details, here’s a pretty good summary of the bill:

High Quality Early Learning Act of 2012

  • Amends current law, established by 2SHB 2731 in 2010, which created a preschool program for low-income and at-risk children, to establish a new preschool program with expanded eligibility and modified program components (based on the technical work group’s recommendations);
  • Implements the new voluntary preschool program in phases;
  • States the legislature’s intent to concurrently phase-in high-quality preschool readiness programs (targeted birth to three and high-quality child care programs);
  • Establishes a subcommittee under the Early Learning Advisory Council to develop and report a preschool readiness implementation plan;
  • States that upon full implementation in the 2024-25 school year, the new preschool program will be an entitlement for all three and four-year-old children in Washington;

Articulates the following program components:

  • All 3 and 4 year-old children are eligible;
  • Until implementation is complete, the DEL must implement guidelines for prioritizing eligible children;
  • Families with incomes above 250% of the federal poverty-level are required to pay a co-pay (amount set by DEL);
  • Allows, but does not require, providers to expend funds on transporting children;
  • Requires a minimum of four-hundred and fifty classroom hours to be provided;
  • Phases in the requirement for lead teachers to have a bachelor’s degree, or equivalent competencies;
  • Limits class-size to 18 children per class;
  • Limits the teacher:child ratio to 1:9;
  • Provides child health coordination services; and
  • Requires DEL to adopt program performance standards or rules for the new program.
  • Public and private early learning providers may apply so long as the program is free from religious instruction, activities or symbolism, control or influence during the period covered by the program.
  • Existing organizations that receive funding through ECEAP are eligible and encouraged to apply for contract under the new program.
  • Requires DEL to award contracts beginning in elementary school enrollment areas [*as defined by school districts], providing all-day kindergarten and where there is lower than average access to head start or ECEAP.

Comments

  1. Marcia Messado says:

    As a former daycare teacher, I agree wholeheartedly on the successes
    of early learning. The life skills acquired are tremendous. My students
    are now pillars of society despite the odds associated with poverty.
    I can proudly say they are doctors, lawyers, photographic journalist, nurses
    healthcare administrators, entrepreneurs. I am glad I was part of such
    a wonderful experience.

  2. Dee Hirsch says:

    I am a professional with many years of providing Early Education, with a Childcare Center license, and also collaborating in the private sector. I know we can all agree by now on the benefits of Early Ed. I do not see evidence yet of the State recognizing the quality of current programs or finding any means to support growth of the best available centers.
    I believe we need to reveal more about the possibility of DEL operating a State program in competition with the private profit/non-profit sector, which is licensed by DEL. I think the conflict of interest is obvious. Currently the DEL has a major roll in this sector for licensing and can dictate inconsistent requirements across the state that are not written in the WAC. DEL has the power through licensors to deny or revoke a license and has many such cases pending and some may be going to court.
    One prevalent issue is the definition of 5 year old children in Preschool vs. School Age. This is unsettled and inconsistent across the state.
    The funding that is now provided through working solutions or working connections across the state as a subsidy for children who are approved for the funding is not enough to support the programs that participate so attendance under this program is limited. If this is the funding model for a new State operated program, there will not be sufficient funds for quality care and education. And since the ratio proposed is to be 1:9 instead of 1:10, there will be fewer children participating in support of professional providers.

  3. Kat McGunagle says:

    I agree with Dee Hirsch’s comments about this being a conflict of interest and the DEL’s inconsistancies.
    I am a Family Home Child Care provider. We have a comprehensive pre-school program that has been proven to be quite successful. Providers already in the child care and Early Learning community are providing this education. A state wide program needs to start with the professionals already providing this service. I also have a concern about the consequences of the McCleary decision. If DEL and OSPI become one department, which is being suggested, the funding for a Washington pre-school program will go to the K-!2 basic education and child care providers will be driven out of business. Proponants argue that this is a voluntary program. I agrue that it is voluntary only in name. If a provider chooses not to participate then they will loose their 3-4 year olds and only be eligible to care for birth through 2 year olds and wrap around care. Providers cannot stay in business just caring for this population. This will cause a shortfall of providers for these children, especially the birth to 2 year olds. It has happened in other states.
    This program needs to be all inclusive without interference from DEL licensing. Funding for such a program needs to be all inclusive from the beginning. Education opportunities for providers needs to be immediate because it could take up to 10 years for a provider to attain a B. A. degree.
    We all want the best for the children of this state. Children have diferent learning styles. Parents deserve a choice as to where their children will receive their pre-school education. With the current plan families have no choice.

  4. Jim says:

    There is a LOT more to this bill than what people are talking about. By the end of “implementation”, this bill amounts to a government takeover of private preschools in Washington. It doesn’t matter that private industry already provides excellent preschool programs for our children. Just another thing that this Nanny State is trying to take over.

    Jim

1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15|16|17|18|19|20|21|22|23|24|25|26|27|28|29|30|31|32|33|34|35|36|37|38|39|40|41|42|43|44|45|46|47|48|49|50|51|52|53|54|55|56|57|58|59|60|61|62|63|64|65|66|67|68|69|70|71|72|73|74|75|76|77|78|79|80|81|82|83|84|85|86|87|88|89|90|91|92|93|94|95|96|97|98|99|100|101|102|103|104|105|106|107|108|109|110|111|112|113|114|115|116|117|118|119|120|121|122|123|124|125|126|127|128|129|130|131|132|133|134|135|136|137|138|139|140|141|142|143|144|145|146|147|148|149|150|151|152|153|154|155|156|157|158|159|160|161|162|163|164|165|166|167|168|169|170|171|172|173|174|175|176|177|178|179|180|181|182|183|184|185|186|187|188|189|190|191|192|193|194|195|196|197|198|199|200|201|202|203|204|205|206|207|208|209|210|211|212|213|214|215|216|217|218|219|220|221|222|223|224|225|226|227|228|229|230|231|232|233|234|235|236|237|238|239| viagra soft uk where to buy viagra or cialis or levitra trial cheap generic viagra from usa generic viagra to buy free viagra alternative viagra sale in india online buy no prescription female cialis how much does viagra cost in canada in pharmacy prescription 1000 mg testex buy generic online viagra costa rica buying viagra viagra generic evaluate pharmacy propecia availability in bangalore india generic viagra online order cialis online without a prescription by viagra in uk uk viagra prices viagra for sale in south africaAccutane Online Doxycycline online Buy Cheap Lexapro Online No Prescription Prednisone Online Buy Accutane No Prescription